UNREPOST

Time & language

Times

UTC is the default. Local uses your device's time zone. Dates without a known time stay the same.

Language

Translates this page in place with Google Translate and keeps it on as you browse. Machine translation can be wrong; the English text is the reviewed record.

All settings

Evidence index

Every receipt

Search and filter. Every view is a shareable link.

Results

20 of 20 receipts · sorted by event date

  1. R-A02 – Figures 54–55: shared posts comparing the app to “crack” and to “4chan but with gambling”Claim status: documented publicationPage 105 reproduces two messages labelled “Alon” that each share a third party's X post. One compares using the app to a drug habit. The other calls the platform '4chan but with gambling', and the participant labelled “out” replies 'lol'. The captions date them 1 May 2024 and 10 April 2024.Dossier ASource type: primary document1 source record · 1 origin
  2. R-A03Figure 56: an April 2024 team conversation about feed designClaim status: documented publicationPages 106–107 show a conversation captioned 26 April 2024. One message proposes a feed where 'at least one new piece of content' appears 'every 2 seconds'. The participant labelled “out” describes the 'bump order' feed's 'flashing lights, constant animations, and action'. “Alon” suggests talking to someone who worked on algorithms at a web2 company. “Sapijiju” mentions an 'Instagram guy'.Dossier ASource type: primary document1 source record · 1 origin
  3. R-A01Complaint reproduces an April 2024 message labelled “Alon” about low oddsClaim status: documented publicationPage 104 of the January 2026 complaint reproduces a chat message labelled “Alon”, captioned 27 April 2024. The message says most low-cap tokens die, that the platform exposed more people to 'really really low odds', and that better discovery would leave people 'generally happier (even though most lose)'.Dossier ASource type: primary document2 source records · 2 origins
  4. R-A04Plaintiffs argue the chats show a platform designed like gamblingClaim status: allegationThe complaint argues that the chats show leadership 'explicitly admitted the platform was gambling' and designed it for addictive engagement (¶¶ 386–392). Those are the plaintiffs' characterisations. The court later rejected the pleaded gambling predicates under New York law.Dossier ASource type: primary document2 source records · 2 origins
  5. R-A05Court lets certain RICO claims proceed and rejects the gambling theoryClaim status: documented publicationJudge McMahon denied the motions to dismiss the RICO counts brought by Carnahan and Okafor against Baton, Cohen, Kerler and Tweedale. She dismissed Aguilar's claims, all claims against the Solana defendants, the Securities Act counts and unjust enrichment. She held that the memecoin transactions alleged are not gambling under New York law.Dossier ASource type: primary documentSource type: first party statement2 source records · 2 origins
  6. R-B01Around 20 October, Pump.fun promotes Kimchi as a creative partnerClaim status: documented publicationProtos reports that Kimchi and Pump.fun worked together on the 'Pill Your Friends' campaign, and that Alon Cohen called Kimchi 'the first ever example of a trader becoming a celebrity'. Alon's own post, now inspected directly on x.com, shows similar language and says Kimchi would help set creative direction.Dossier BSource type: secondary captureSource type: unavailable originalSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement7 source records · 4 origins
  7. R-B02Bitquery: three linked wallets took about $104K from a 20 October copy KIMCHIClaim status: analysisBitquery reports that a copy KIMCHI ('Aura Final Boss') launched at 23:00:15 UTC on 20 October 2026. It says three wallets that held the July token sold it within about a minute and bought the copy, taking about $104K out within nine minutes. It found no direct transfers between those wallets and the deployer.Dossier BSource type: analyst reportSource type: chain readSource type: first party statement4 source records · 3 origins
  8. R-B0322 October: a QR-code post for “Project Kimchi”, a repost by Alon, then both goneClaim status: reported eventcrypto.news and Protos report that Kimchi's X account posted an image with a QR code linking to a new Pump.fun token, that Alon reposted it, and that the post and repost were later removed. Protos adds that Kimchi's account then deleted Pump.fun-related posts and removed the platform from its bio.Dossier BSource type: news reportSource type: chain readSource type: secondary captureSource type: analyst reportSource type: first party statement14 source records · 9 origins
  9. R-B04Reported peak and decline of Project Kimchi: observations differClaim status: reported eventReports differ. Lookonchain (via crypto.news) gives a peak of about $14M and a fall of more than 95%. Protos gives $14M, then about $600,000 within minutes. FinanceFeeds gives about $15M and a fall of more than 98% to $284,000. On 27 October our own API read showed about $122K–$130K, depending on the pool.Dossier BSource type: news reportSource type: chain readSource type: analyst reportSource type: market data7 source records · 6 origins
  10. R-B05Lookonchain flagged wallets with more than $385K in estimated Project Kimchi profitsClaim status: analysiscrypto.news reports that Lookonchain identified several wallets that bought early and sold during the rally, with combined estimated profits above $385,000, and that Kimchi's account had received 500M tokens. 99Bitcoins and FinanceFeeds repeat the $385K figure, citing Lookonchain.Dossier BSource type: news reportSource type: analyst report5 source records · 4 origins
  11. R-B06Traders publicly demand refunds from AlonClaim status: documented publicationA post by @tontheneko, now inspected directly on x.com, asks Alon to refund people who lost money on the coin he reposted, arguing that he should have checked it first. crypto.news reports this demand as an allegation and says it found no verified refund arrangement.Dossier BSource type: secondary captureSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement5 source records · 3 origins
  12. R-B07 – The “hacked account” theory remains unconfirmedClaim status: disputedProtos reports that many users suspected Kimchi had been hacked. Others suspected the post was intentional or mismanaged. Trader Fabiano noted that Alon shared no hack warning after unsharing it. crypto.news and 99Bitcoins both say the hack theory is unconfirmed.Dossier BSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement10 source records · 7 origins
  13. R-B09A promotional “$40M on TRUMP” claim meets a ~$6M traceable figureClaim status: analysisProtos reports that Pump.fun's promotion repeated an unverified claim that Kimchi made over $40M trading TRUMP. Bubblemaps' thread says that claim began as an unverified 2025 rumour. It reports about $6M in TRUMP profit for one wallet it traced, and says another address may exist.Dossier BSource type: secondary captureSource type: news reportSource type: analyst report8 source records · 3 origins
  14. R-C03Pump.fun announces a $2.5M Squads trading competitionClaim status: documented publicationAlon's post, inspected directly on x.com, announces 'the BIGGEST competition we've ever hosted on the Pumpfun app': $2.5M for the top three Squads by PnL over two weeks. The earlier captured Pump.fun quote records a Monday, 26 October sign-up deadline; X's current native quoted preview is truncated. Protos reports that critics say the format favours large KOL groups.Dossier CSource type: secondary captureSource type: unavailable originalSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement10 source records · 5 origins
  15. R-A06 – October 2026: the court screenshots recirculate on X as if newClaim status: reported eventJournal du Coin reported on 26 October 2026 that screenshots circulating on X as a 'fresh revelation' came from the second amended complaint, which was filed in January 2026. Protos separately reported that Crypto Banter shared a snippet from the amended lawsuit during the boycott.Dossier ASource type: news reportSource type: primary documentSource type: first party statement5 source records · 4 origins
  16. R-B0825 October: Kimchi reportedly restores Pump.fun to his bioClaim status: reported event99Bitcoins reports that Kimchi added Pump.fun back to his X bio on 25 October, three days after removing it, and that a KIMCHI token briefly rose more than 150%. Protos also notes the bio restoration. Neither party had explained the change.Dossier BSource type: news reportSource type: unavailable originalSource type: analyst report8 source records · 3 origins
  17. R-C01 – #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN: traders call for a boycottClaim status: reported eventProtos reports that traders promoted #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN over the missing airdrop, rug pulls and the Kimchi launch. One trader, Jack Duval, said he wanted to 'tank' Pump.fun's revenue until an airdrop is released.Dossier CSource type: news reportSource type: secondary captureSource type: first party statement13 source records · 6 origins
  18. R-C02Airdrop complaints: an old “coming soon” and no deliveryClaim status: reported eventProtos writes that 474 days had passed since Pump.fun teased that an airdrop was 'coming soon'. The article does not date or link that original teaser, so UNREPOST shows no delay counter.Dossier CSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement5 source records · 3 origins
  19. R-B10No explanation from Alon or Pump.fun was located (as of 27 October 2026)Claim status: reported eventcrypto.news (23 October) reports no statement from Alon or Pump.fun about the promotion, the deletions or the allegations. Protos (26 October) says neither Cohen nor Kimchi had commented further. 99Bitcoins (26 October) says neither party had explained.Dossier BSource type: news report3 source records · 3 origins
  20. R-C04Case status at the research cutoff: pleading-stage RICO claims pendingClaim status: documented publicationPer the 31 August 2026 opinion, Counts I and II remain pending, but only as brought by Carnahan and Okafor against Baton, Cohen, Kerler and Tweedale. Every other count, and every claim against the Solana defendants, was dismissed. Plaintiffs had to show cause by 10 September 2026 about the unserved KOL Doe defendants. We could not verify later filings.Dossier CSource type: primary documentSource type: first party statement2 source records · 2 origins