- Event
- First reported
- Last checked
- · reviewed
Summary
99Bitcoins reports that Kimchi added Pump.fun back to his X bio on 25 October, three days after removing it, and that a KIMCHI token briefly rose more than 150%. Protos also notes the bio restoration. Neither party had explained the change.
What the sources support
Two reporting origins, with 99Bitcoins syndications counted once, plus Lookonchain's two own X posts. The analyst posts share one origin.
- That the bio change was reported by two separate outlets.
What remains unresolved
- Whether any commercial agreement was renewed. A bio edit does not establish that, and 99Bitcoins labels its own suggestion as inference.
- Which KIMCHI mint rose 150%. The report gives none, so no mint is attached.
Limits of this receipt
- The 99Bitcoins original returned HTTP 403. We read the syndicated copies.
The screenshots

Lookonchain: Kimchi removes Pump.fun from his bio
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The bio change and its timing, by an on-chain analyst. 3 separately captured carousel views are labelled and joined vertically.
- Source
- S64 x.com
- Post date shown
- 1:34 PM · Oct 23, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- 3 separate normal-browser carousel views are labelled Part N of K and joined vertically without resizing; the result is not presented as one continuous screenshot.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Personal links covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- “May have received” is Lookonchain's inference from wallet data. Revenue changes are not shown to be caused by the episode.

Lookonchain: Kimchi adds Pump.fun back to his bio
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The bio restored, and a well-timed purchase. 2 separately captured carousel views are labelled and joined vertically.
- Source
- S65 x.com
- Post date shown
- 4:13 PM · Oct 26, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- 2 separate normal-browser carousel views are labelled Part N of K and joined vertically without resizing; the result is not presented as one continuous screenshot.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Personal links covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- “Coincidentally” is Lookonchain's word. A purchase before a public change does not show advance knowledge.
All images: image archive.
Token identities involved
Evidence tokens, kept apart by mint. Not $UNDO. No trading links.
KIMCHI token in the 26 October bio-restoration report (mint not identified)
Mint not identified by the source. Kept as a separate, unresolved identity.
Basis
99Bitcoins (S08) reports a KIMCHI price jump citing DEX Screener but gives no mint. Until a mint is identified, this stays a separate, unresolved identity.
Sources
- The KIMCHI price move is attributed to DEX Screener without a mint address. UNREPOST has not linked it to a specific token identity.
- The article itself says its view that the deal is back on is the author's inference.
- Same reporting origin as S08. It is not independent confirmation.
- Not inspected directly. We rely on the syndicated copies, S08 and S08-YF.
- Boycott calls are participants' positions. The article does not measure how many people took part or what effect it had.
- The '474 days since an airdrop was teased' count is not tied to a dated original statement in the article, so UNREPOST does not show a delay counter.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- “May have received” is Lookonchain's inference from wallet data. Revenue changes are not shown to be caused by the episode.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- “Coincidentally” is Lookonchain's word. A purchase before a public change does not show advance knowledge.
Responses, rebuttals & corrections
No response from the people or companies discussed was located as of the cutoff. That does not mean none exists. Send one.
Correction C-0002 ·
Updated source-access and image-acquisition descriptions after a direct x.com recheck. Current receipt wording now identifies the inspected original posts, while deleted originals remain uninspected and analyst/author claims retain their limits.
A signed-in normal browser made the current post views available on 28 October 2026. Earlier capture-service/embed records and their access history are preserved; this does not authenticate deleted originals or prove the posts' allegations.
R-A06.supportSummary: "Two independent news reports (different origin groups) plus the complaint itself."
R-B01.summary: "Protos reports that Kimchi and Pump.fun worked together on the 'Pill Your Friends' campaign, and that Alon Cohen called Kimchi 'the first ever example of a trader becoming a celebrity'. A capture of Alon's 20 October post shows similar language and says Kimchi would help set creative direction."
R-B01.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 20 October 2026, 23:19 UTC. That time is derived from the ID, not displayed by an original we inspected."
R-B01.supportSummary: "A third-party capture of the post (the original returned HTTP 402) and Protos's account."
R-B01.limitations: ["The original post was not inspected. A capture service supplied the text."]
R-B03.limitations: ["UNREPOST has not seen the deleted posts. They are not presented as inspected originals.","No capture of Kimchi's QR-code post or of Alon's repost was located, so neither is pictured. The poster image shown comes from a third party's refund demand (S15).","A repost and its removal do not by themselves show coordination, intent, wallet ownership or profit."]
R-B04.limitations: ["Market cap is not cash stolen, money deposited or traders' realised losses.","The Lookonchain figures are secondary: the original post was not inspected (S17)."]
R-B05.limitations: ["The Lookonchain original was not inspected (S17).","This estimate must not be combined with Bitquery's figure for the separate 20 October token (R-B02)."]
R-B06.summary: "A captured post by @tontheneko asks Alon to refund people who lost money on the coin he reposted, arguing that he should have checked it first. crypto.news reports this demand as an allegation and says it found no verified refund arrangement."
R-B06.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 22 October 2026, 20:54 UTC. That time is derived from the ID. The capture was taken 23 October, 01:01:31 UTC."
R-B06.supportSummary: "A capture of the demand and a news report that describes it."
R-B07.supportSummary: "Several reports describing competing explanations, with no attributable confirmation."
R-B08.supportSummary: "Two reporting origins: 99Bitcoins, with its two syndications counted once, and Protos."
R-B09.eventDateNote: "The thread's status IDs decode to 22 October 2026, 10:39 UTC. That time is derived. Post 1/ was captured 23 October, 00:43:41 UTC; posts 2/ to 4/ on 26 October, 20:03:32 UTC."
R-B09.supportSummary: "The analyst's own thread, posts 1/ to 4/, via captures, and two reports that cite it."
R-C01.supportSummary: "One news report linking several participants' posts."
R-C02.supportSummary: "A single news report."
R-C03.summary: "A capture of Alon's post shows him announcing 'the BIGGEST competition we've ever hosted on the Pumpfun app': $2.5M for the top three Squads by PnL over two weeks. Per the capture, the quoted Pump.fun post set the sign-up deadline at Monday, 26 October. Protos reports that critics say the format favours large KOL groups."
R-C03.supportSummary: "A third-party capture of the announcement and a news report."
R-C03.supports: ["The announced prize structure and dates, as captured."]
R-C03.unresolved: ["The terms as finally run. The capture notes the post was later edited."]
R-C03.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 23 October 2026, 15:05 UTC. That time is derived. The capture was taken 24 October, 00:36:32 UTC."
Related receipts
Revision history
| Revision | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Added a Settings choice between redacted and original post screenshots without redactions. The default remains redacted; capture dates, source attribution and claim limitations are unchanged. Release 2026.10.29-r6. | |
| 3 | Replaced linked capture-service/embed images with reviewed direct x.com screenshots; added sources S64, S65. Full text, attachments, visible timestamps and labelled redactions were checked. Earlier sources and revisions remain available; claim limitations are preserved. Release 2026.10.28-r5. | |
| 2 | Added Lookonchain's two bio posts (S36, S37). Release 2026.10.28-r4. | |
| 1 | First publication in release 2026.10.28-r1. |