- Event
- First reported
- Last checked
- · reviewed
About this date
The date of this status check.
Summary
Per the 31 August 2026 opinion, Counts I and II remain pending, but only as brought by Carnahan and Okafor against Baton, Cohen, Kerler and Tweedale. Every other count, and every claim against the Solana defendants, was dismissed. Plaintiffs had to show cause by 10 September 2026 about the unserved KOL Doe defendants. We could not verify later filings.
What the sources support
The opinion itself, and plaintiffs' counsel's update list, which shows nothing after 2 September 2026.
- The procedural position as of the opinion.
What remains unresolved
- Any later orders, answers, discovery schedule, settlement or appeal. The CourtListener docket returned HTTP 403 to us.
Limits of this receipt
- This is a civil case. Nothing in it is a criminal charge or conviction.
Identifiers
- Case
- 1:25-cv-00880 (CM), S.D.N.Y.
- Related case
- 1:25-cv-00490 (Carnahan; per S03)
Related judicial decision
Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss:
At this stage a court assumes the complaint's factual allegations are true and asks only whether they state a legal claim. Some RICO claims passed that test and continue. Many other claims did not. The ruling does not decide what actually happened, and the court said that 12(b)(6) dismissals were with prejudice.
- Allowed to proceed Counts I–II: substantive RICO and RICO conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (d)): Carnahan and Okafor v. Baton Corporation Ltd., Alon Cohen, Dylan Kerler, Noah Tweedale.
- Dismissed All claims by Diego Aguilar: Aguilar v. every moving defendant.
- Dismissed All claims against the Solana defendants: Solana Labs, Solana Foundation, Yakovenko, Gokal, Albert, Federa, Liu.
- Predicate rejected Gambling predicates (18 U.S.C. § 1955; N.Y. Penal Law §§ 225.05, 225.10): All moving defendants.
Sources
- This decides motions to dismiss. It asks whether allegations, assumed true, state a claim. It is not a finding that any allegation was proven.
- UNREPOST could not load the CourtListener docket (HTTP 403 on 27 October 2026), so filings after 31 August 2026 have not been checked.
- This copy comes from plaintiffs' counsel's website. It matches the case caption and docket references, but we did not compare it with the PACER original.
- This is an advocate's summary. Use it for case identifiers and update dates, not as a neutral account of the ruling.
- The page lists no development after 2 September 2026. That does not show nothing happened later.
Responses, rebuttals & corrections
No response from the people or companies discussed was located as of the cutoff. That does not mean none exists. Send one.
Related receipts
Revision history
| Revision | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | First publication in release 2026.10.28-r1. |