UNREPOST

Time & language

Times

UTC is the default. Local uses your device's time zone. Dates without a known time stay the same.

Language

Translates this page in place with Google Translate and keeps it on as you browse. Machine translation can be wrong; the English text is the reviewed record.

All settings

Evidence / Dossier A / R-A03 · rev. 2

Figure 56: an April 2024 team conversation about feed design

Who said what in Figure 56, as labelled in the screenshot?

documented publicationprimary document1 source record from 1 reporting origin

documented publication: The cited material was published as described. Says nothing about whether its contents are true.

Event
First reported
Last checked
· reviewed
About this date

Date from the Figure 56 caption. The in-image times have no timezone.

Pages 106–107 show a conversation captioned 26 April 2024. One message proposes a feed where 'at least one new piece of content' appears 'every 2 seconds'. The participant labelled “out” describes the 'bump order' feed's 'flashing lights, constant animations, and action'. “Alon” suggests talking to someone who worked on algorithms at a web2 company. “Sapijiju” mentions an 'Instagram guy'.

“at least one new piece of content has to be shown to a user every 2 seconds”

(sender not visible on page 106) — Part of a long message in Figure 56. The sender's label is not visible in the page-106 image; the complaint places it in a conversation among Alon, Out and Sapijiju. Dated: April 26, 2024 (Figure 56 caption). S01, p. 106, fig. 56Context: From a message describing a feed that ranks content by 'contextual relevance' and combines it with a 'threshold of excitement'. The same message calls these 'just some thoughts i had before going to bed'.Authentication limit: transcribed from a screenshot published in a party's court filing. The original chat has not been authenticated by UNREPOST.

“flashing lights, constant animations, and action”

out — In a message by the participant labelled “out”. The complaint identifies “Out” as Dylan Kerler. It is not a message labelled “Alon”. Dated: April 26, 2024 (Figure 56 caption). S01, p. 107, fig. 56Context: The participant says these thoughts came from finding the 'following' feed boring and switching back to the 'bump order' feed, 'where there were flashing lights, constant animations, and action'.Authentication limit: transcribed from a screenshot published in a party's court filing. The original chat has not been authenticated by UNREPOST.

“We should probably talk to someone that was working on algorithms at a web2 company”

Alon — Reply labelled “Alon” in Figure 56. The complaint identifies the sender as Alon Cohen. Dated: April 26, 2024 (Figure 56 caption). S01, p. 107, fig. 56Context: The message continues: it 'would help understand how they went about constructing this, how they tested factors and tactics'.Authentication limit: transcribed from a screenshot published in a party's court filing. The original chat has not been authenticated by UNREPOST.

What the sources support

The complaint PDF, pages 106–107, Figure 56.

  • The words shown, and which on-screen label each message carries.
  • The complaint maps the labels to Alon Cohen, Dylan Kerler (“Out”) and Noah Tweedale (“Sapijiju”).

What remains unresolved

  • The sender of the long 'every 2 seconds' message is not visible in the page-106 image.
  • The complaint's ¶ 391 summary ('Leadership suggested...') merges several speakers. The screenshot shows separate messages from different labels.
  • Whether these ideas were implemented as described. The complaint asserts this (¶ 392), and it is an allegation.
Limits of this receipt
  • Authentication limitation: these are screenshots in a party's filing, and the full conversation is not available to UNREPOST.

Source card for R-A03

Rendered in your browser. It carries this receipt's claim label, its source host, the date, the research cutoff and the receipt link. It is an evidence card, so it has no satire styling and no caption.

Size