- Event
- –
- First reported
- Last checked
- · reviewed
About this date
Duval's linked status ID decodes to 25 October 2026, 09:13 UTC. That time is derived. The article is dated 26 October.
Summary
Protos reports that traders promoted #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN over the missing airdrop, rug pulls and the Kimchi launch. One trader, Jack Duval, said he wanted to 'tank' Pump.fun's revenue until an airdrop is released.
What the sources support
One news report and the linked participants' own posts, inspected directly on x.com.
- That boycott calls were made, and what participants said they wanted.
What remains unresolved
- How many people took part.
- Any effect on revenue. crypto.news notes that reported revenue and active-address declines over two days do not show the controversy caused them.
Limits of this receipt
- Participants' claims are theirs. A boycott call does not measure adoption.
The screenshots

#BOYCOTTPUMPFUN post by @RonPull
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN post and its attached graphic, inspected directly on x.com. Protos credits this account with an early version of the graphic. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S43 x.com
- Post date shown
- 7:53 PM · Oct 23, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- Engagement counts do not measure participation in a boycott.

@RobinAlphas joins #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The boycott graphic, as one participant posted it. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S58 x.com
- Post date shown
- 11:55 PM · Oct 24, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.

@RonPull: “boycott pumpfun baby”
Redacted view · Change in Settings
RON's reply “boycott pumpfun baby” beneath Crypto Banter's parent post, with RON's native quote of his earlier boycott graphic. This view preserves X's displayed parent context. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S59 x.com
- Post date shown
- 5:37 PM · Oct 26, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to X's displayed thread context: Crypto Banter's parent post above RON's target reply and the target's native quoted boycott post. Target text/date preserved; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- Crypto Banter's post is displayed parent context above RON's reply. RON's own native quoted card is the earlier boycott post; this view does not contain two embedded quote cards.
- The parent post recirculates lawsuit allegations, not findings. Read the court record for the pleading-stage ruling.

@W0LF0FCRYPT0: boycott post citing the missing airdrop
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The airdrop complaint and the boycott, in one post. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S60 x.com
- Post date shown
- 11:38 PM · Oct 25, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- The dollar figures are the author's, not verified by UNREPOST.

@mcdonaldsboy_: “Why is #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN trending?”
Redacted view · Change in Settings
How the boycott was explained to newcomers. Its figures are the author's. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S61 x.com
- Post date shown
- 1:59 AM · Oct 26, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- The ~$43M figure and “reportedly bought early” are the author's and refer to a token the post does not identify by mint.

@jackduval: a boycott “movement” announced in the Pump.fun app
Redacted view · Change in Settings
The boycott, organised from inside the app it targets. Direct x.com screenshot.
- Source
- S62 x.com
- Post date shown
- Last edited 5:13 PM · Oct 25, 2026
- Screenshot taken
Edits & limits
What UNREPOST changed:
- Cropped to the target post, preserving its text, visible attachments and date/time line; unrelated replies, side panels and lower reply-filter controls omitted.
- Photographs of people, including portrait avatars where present, covered with visible labelled boxes.
- Provenance strips give x.com, capture UTC, sign-in state, displayed date/time and the meaning of each redaction label.
Limits:
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
All images: image archive.
Sources
- Boycott calls are participants' positions. The article does not measure how many people took part or what effect it had.
- The '474 days since an airdrop was teased' count is not tied to a dated original statement in the article, so UNREPOST does not show a delay counter.
- Only the hashtag and engagement counts were captured. The boycott graphic is not in the capture.
- Engagement counts are not a measure of how many people boycotted.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- This is X's live rendering on 28 Oct 2026. The post may have been edited before then, and X truncates long text.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- Engagement counts do not measure participation in a boycott.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- Crypto Banter's post is displayed parent context above RON's reply. RON's own native quoted card is the earlier boycott post; this view does not contain two embedded quote cards.
- The parent post recirculates lawsuit allegations, not findings. Read the court record for the pleading-stage ruling.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- The dollar figures are the author's, not verified by UNREPOST.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
- The ~$43M figure and “reportedly bought early” are the author's and refer to a token the post does not identify by mint.
- A screenshot records what X displayed at capture time, not whether the author's claims are true.
- A current screenshot does not authenticate earlier edits, deleted originals or screenshots attached by another author.
- A post is its author's claim or opinion. Allegations in it are not findings.
Responses, rebuttals & corrections
No response from the people or companies discussed was located as of the cutoff. That does not mean none exists. Send one.
Correction C-0002 ·
Updated source-access and image-acquisition descriptions after a direct x.com recheck. Current receipt wording now identifies the inspected original posts, while deleted originals remain uninspected and analyst/author claims retain their limits.
A signed-in normal browser made the current post views available on 28 October 2026. Earlier capture-service/embed records and their access history are preserved; this does not authenticate deleted originals or prove the posts' allegations.
R-A06.supportSummary: "Two independent news reports (different origin groups) plus the complaint itself."
R-B01.summary: "Protos reports that Kimchi and Pump.fun worked together on the 'Pill Your Friends' campaign, and that Alon Cohen called Kimchi 'the first ever example of a trader becoming a celebrity'. A capture of Alon's 20 October post shows similar language and says Kimchi would help set creative direction."
R-B01.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 20 October 2026, 23:19 UTC. That time is derived from the ID, not displayed by an original we inspected."
R-B01.supportSummary: "A third-party capture of the post (the original returned HTTP 402) and Protos's account."
R-B01.limitations: ["The original post was not inspected. A capture service supplied the text."]
R-B03.limitations: ["UNREPOST has not seen the deleted posts. They are not presented as inspected originals.","No capture of Kimchi's QR-code post or of Alon's repost was located, so neither is pictured. The poster image shown comes from a third party's refund demand (S15).","A repost and its removal do not by themselves show coordination, intent, wallet ownership or profit."]
R-B04.limitations: ["Market cap is not cash stolen, money deposited or traders' realised losses.","The Lookonchain figures are secondary: the original post was not inspected (S17)."]
R-B05.limitations: ["The Lookonchain original was not inspected (S17).","This estimate must not be combined with Bitquery's figure for the separate 20 October token (R-B02)."]
R-B06.summary: "A captured post by @tontheneko asks Alon to refund people who lost money on the coin he reposted, arguing that he should have checked it first. crypto.news reports this demand as an allegation and says it found no verified refund arrangement."
R-B06.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 22 October 2026, 20:54 UTC. That time is derived from the ID. The capture was taken 23 October, 01:01:31 UTC."
R-B06.supportSummary: "A capture of the demand and a news report that describes it."
R-B07.supportSummary: "Several reports describing competing explanations, with no attributable confirmation."
R-B08.supportSummary: "Two reporting origins: 99Bitcoins, with its two syndications counted once, and Protos."
R-B09.eventDateNote: "The thread's status IDs decode to 22 October 2026, 10:39 UTC. That time is derived. Post 1/ was captured 23 October, 00:43:41 UTC; posts 2/ to 4/ on 26 October, 20:03:32 UTC."
R-B09.supportSummary: "The analyst's own thread, posts 1/ to 4/, via captures, and two reports that cite it."
R-C01.supportSummary: "One news report linking several participants' posts."
R-C02.supportSummary: "A single news report."
R-C03.summary: "A capture of Alon's post shows him announcing 'the BIGGEST competition we've ever hosted on the Pumpfun app': $2.5M for the top three Squads by PnL over two weeks. Per the capture, the quoted Pump.fun post set the sign-up deadline at Monday, 26 October. Protos reports that critics say the format favours large KOL groups."
R-C03.supportSummary: "A third-party capture of the announcement and a news report."
R-C03.supports: ["The announced prize structure and dates, as captured."]
R-C03.unresolved: ["The terms as finally run. The capture notes the post was later edited."]
R-C03.eventDateNote: "The status ID decodes to 23 October 2026, 15:05 UTC. That time is derived. The capture was taken 24 October, 00:36:32 UTC."
Related receipts
Revision history
| Revision | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Added a Settings choice between redacted and original post screenshots without redactions. The default remains redacted; capture dates, source attribution and claim limitations are unchanged. Release 2026.10.29-r6. | |
| 4 | Replaced linked capture-service/embed images with reviewed direct x.com screenshots; added sources S43, S58, S59, S60, S61, S62. Full text, attachments, visible timestamps and labelled redactions were checked. Earlier sources and revisions remain available; claim limitations are preserved. Release 2026.10.28-r5. | |
| 3 | Added five boycott posts (S30–S34), including the graphic the earlier capture lacked. Release 2026.10.28-r4. | |
| 2 | Added the captured @RonPull boycott post (new source S18). Release 2026.10.28-r2. | |
| 1 | First publication in release 2026.10.28-r1. |