UNREPOST

Time & language

Times

UTC is the default. Local uses your device's time zone. Dates without a known time stay the same.

Language

Translates this page in place with Google Translate and keeps it on as you browse. Machine translation can be wrong; the English text is the reviewed record.

All settings

Evidence / Dossier B / R-B06 · rev. 5

Traders publicly demand refunds from Alon

Did anyone ask for refunds, and was any refund arranged?

Claim status: documented publicationSource type: secondary captureSource type: news reportSource type: first party statement5 source records from 3 reporting origins

documented publication: The cited material was published as described. Says nothing about whether its contents are true.

Event
First reported
Last checked
· reviewed
About this date

The post displays 4:54 AM · Oct 23, 2026 at UTC+8, equivalent to 22 October 20:54 UTC. The displayed minute is stored without inferred seconds.

Summary

A post by @tontheneko, now inspected directly on x.com, asks Alon to refund people who lost money on the coin he reposted, arguing that he should have checked it first. crypto.news reports this demand as an allegation and says it found no verified refund arrangement.

What the sources support

The author's own post, inspected directly on x.com, and a news report that describes the demand.

  • That at least one public refund demand was made.
  • That, as of 23 October, crypto.news found no verified refund arrangement.

What remains unresolved

  • How many people sought refunds.
  • Whether any refund has been made since. No proof of any refund is presented here, and none is invented.
Limits of this receipt
  • A demand is a complainant's position, not a finding of responsibility.

Source card for R-B06

Rendered in your browser. It carries this receipt's claim label, its source host, the date, the research cutoff and the receipt link. It is an evidence card, so it has no satire styling and no caption.

Size