- Event
- First reported
- Last checked
- · reviewed
About this date
This is the date of our search, not an event.
Summary
crypto.news (23 October) reports no statement from Alon or Pump.fun about the promotion, the deletions or the allegations. Protos (26 October) says neither Cohen nor Kimchi had commented further. 99Bitcoins (26 October) says neither party had explained.
What the sources support
Three outlets reporting that they found no explanation, plus our own web search on 27 October 2026.
- That no explanation was located in the reports listed, or in a general web search on 27 October 2026.
What remains unresolved
- Whether a response exists somewhere we did not search, such as X replies, Spaces, Telegram or Discord. Our automated access to X is restricted.
Limits of this receipt
- Search scope: the sources listed and one web search on 27 October 2026. This does not show that no response exists.
Sources
S04Source type: news reportOpened
crypto.news · Olivia Stephanie (edited by Rony Roy)
Published: · Last checked:
- Its market and wallet figures are attributed to Lookonchain. Until the Lookonchain originals are retrieved, they are secondary support for Lookonchain's claims.
- The article itself warns that market capitalisation is not money lost, and that wallet transfers do not show who controlled the addresses.
S07Source type: news reportOpened
Protos · Protos Staff
Published: · Last checked:
- Boycott calls are participants' positions. The article does not measure how many people took part or what effect it had.
- The '474 days since an airdrop was teased' count is not tied to a dated original statement in the article, so UNREPOST does not show a delay counter.
S08Source type: news reportOpened
Kimchi Puts Pump.fun Back in His Bio and His Token Jumps 150%: Is the Partnership Back On? (TradingView syndication) tradingview.com
99Bitcoins via TradingView News
Published: No article timestamp displayed on the TradingView copy · Last checked:
- The KIMCHI price move is attributed to DEX Screener without a mint address. UNREPOST has not linked it to a specific token identity.
- The article itself says its view that the deal is back on is the author's inference.
Responses, rebuttals & corrections
No response from the people or companies discussed was located as of the cutoff. That does not mean none exists. Send one.
Related receipts
Revision history
| Revision | Date | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | First publication in release 2026.10.28-r1. |