UNREPOST

Time & language

Times

UTC is the default. Local uses your device's time zone. Dates without a known time stay the same.

Language

Translates this page in place with Google Translate and keeps it on as you browse. Machine translation can be wrong; the English text is the reviewed record.

All settings

Evidence / Dossier B / R-B04 · rev. 4

Reported peak and decline of Project Kimchi: observations differ

How high did Project Kimchi's market cap go, and how far did it fall?

Claim status: reported eventSource type: news reportSource type: chain readSource type: analyst reportSource type: market data7 source records from 6 reporting origins

reported event: An event described by attributed reporting. Not independently confirmed by UNREPOST.

Event
First reported
Last checked
· reviewed

Summary

Reports differ. Lookonchain (via crypto.news) gives a peak of about $14M and a fall of more than 95%. Protos gives $14M, then about $600,000 within minutes. FinanceFeeds gives about $15M and a fall of more than 98% to $284,000. On 27 October our own API read showed about $122K–$130K, depending on the pool.

What the sources support

Attributed observations listed separately. We do not average them.

  • That reported market capitalisation rose sharply and then fell by most of its value.

What remains unresolved

  • The precise peak and the time of each observation. No historical price dataset with timestamps is used here.
  • How much money traders actually put in, took out or lost.
Limits of this receipt
  • Market cap is not cash stolen, money deposited or traders' realised losses.
  • Lookonchain's own post is now inspected directly. Its wallet attribution and price observation remain analyst claims, not UNREPOST's own chain reconstruction.

Source card for R-B04

Rendered in your browser. It carries this receipt's claim label, its source host, the date, the research cutoff and the receipt link. It is an evidence card, so it has no satire styling and no caption.

Size