A ticker is not an identity. Anyone can launch a token called KIMCHI. On Solana, the identity of a fungible token is its mint address.
Identities in this archive
| Record | Mint | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Older KIMCHI / “Aura Final Boss” (July 2026) | Am8iBffqgaedfdK5XhtorbcRrKzwH9nyL3ySikQfpump |
Bitquery; confirmed as a mint by our RPC read. |
| 20 October KIMCHI / “Aura Final Boss” (copy launch) | CSocnzcRpgSCr1naKcNTieWZUxb6rABe45j844m7pump |
Bitquery; confirmed by our RPC read. |
| 22 October “project kimchi” (QR-code token) | B1Y2fJW8rtirrBuUcda14pSaeiASHaGqTxQdxU8Mpump |
The market Protos linked; resolved through DEX Screener’s API and our RPC read. |
| KIMCHI in the 25–26 October bio report | not identified | The report names no mint. It stays unresolved. |
| UNREPOST / UNDO | not configured | The project’s own future token. |
Rules
- Figures attached to one mint are never applied to another. Bitquery’s ~$104K is about the 20 October copy. Lookonchain’s >$385K is about Project Kimchi. They are never added together.
- Evidence tokens get neutral links only: Open explorer and Open market reference. They never get a buy button.
- At build time, the site rejects any
$UNDOconfiguration that matches an evidence mint, or a market link that contains one.
Our chain observations
On 27 October 2026 we read each of the three mints over Solana RPC. All three were Token-2022 mints with no mint authority and no freeze authority at the recorded slots. That is a snapshot. It says nothing about who holds the tokens, who controls any wallet, or whether a token is “safe”.