UNREPOST

Time & language

Times

UTC is the default. Local uses your device's time zone. Dates without a known time stay the same.

Language

Translates this page in place with Google Translate and keeps it on as you browse. Machine translation can be wrong; the English text is the reviewed record.

All settings

Court record · 1 of 3

The chat figures

PDF pages 104–107 of the complaint. Dates are from the captions.

FigurePDF pageDated (caption)What it showsReceipt
53p. 104Message labelled “Alon” on low odds; contains the “happier (even though most lose)” lineR-A01
54p. 105Shared third-party post comparing the app to a drug habitR-A02
55p. 105Shared “4chan but with gambling” post and a replyR-A02
56p. 106Conversation on feed design (continues to p. 107)R-A03

Filed, not authenticated. The plaintiffs chose these screenshots.

Details

Their appearance in the filing establishes that they were filed. It does not authenticate the original Telegram messages, show that the excerpts are complete, or prove the plaintiffs' reading of them. The opinion notes that plaintiffs obtained nearly 5,000 internal chat messages. This archive holds none of them.

As filed

Telegram-style chat bubble labelled Alon, dated April 27, 2024, timestamp 15:24. It says most low-cap tokens die, that trading lowcaps was democratized so that everyone is exposed to really low odds, and ends: people will generally be happier (even though most lose).

Figure 53: message labelled “Alon”

M-01primary documentimage from the filed PDF

Figure 53 as embedded on PDF page 104 of the second amended complaint.

Source
S01, PDF p. 104, fig. 53 storage.courtlistener.com
Dated
27 April 2024 (figure caption)
Chat bubble labelled Alon containing a link to an X post by a third-party user, previewed as: pumpfuns feels like doing crack everyday, @a1lon9 what have you done to us. Timestamp 00:07.

Figure 54: shared post comparing the app to a drug habit

M-02primary documentimage from the filed PDF

Figure 54 as embedded on PDF page 105. The words in the preview were written by a third-party X user, not by anyone in the chat.

Source
S01, PDF p. 105, fig. 54 storage.courtlistener.com
Dated
1 May 2024 (figure caption)
Chat bubble labelled Alon sharing an X post by Mr. Frog that reads: It really is 4chan but with gambling. Inside it is an embedded imageboard reply whose text UNREPOST has covered with a labelled redaction box. Below, a participant labelled out replies: lol.

Figure 55: shared “4chan but with gambling” post and reply

M-03primary documentimage from the filed PDF

Figure 55 as embedded on PDF page 105, with one abusive line of third-party imageboard text covered by UNREPOST.

Source
S01, PDF p. 105, fig. 55 storage.courtlistener.com
Dated
10 April 2024 (figure caption)
Long chat message, sender label not visible, describing a feed ranked by contextual relevance with a threshold of excitement, so that at least one new piece of content is shown to a user every 2 seconds. Timestamp 00:46.

Figure 56, part 1: long message on feed design

M-04primary documentimage from the filed PDF

The first image of Figure 56, embedded on PDF page 106. The sender's label is cut off in the filed image.

Source
S01, PDF p. 106, fig. 56 (part 1) storage.courtlistener.com
Dated
26 April 2024 (Figure 56 caption)
Continuation of the chat. A message from out mentions the bump order feed with flashing lights, constant animations, and action. Alon replies that they should talk to someone who worked on algorithms at a web2 company. Sapijiju writes: Yh we can speak to Instagram guy.

Figure 56, part 2: conversation among “Alon”, “out” and “Sapijiju”

M-05primary documentimage from the filed PDF

The second image of Figure 56, embedded on PDF page 107.

Source
S01, PDF p. 107, fig. 56 (part 2) storage.courtlistener.com
Dated
26 April 2024 (Figure 56 caption)

Full captions and edit notes →